What is behind this choice of location?

Alaska was not chosen by chance: it is a neutral site with historical ties to Russia, and, interestingly, outside the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, which is important in the context of the search for Putin, which was aimed at it

What are they planning to talk about?

The main topic is ending the conflict in Ukraine. Trump has already suggested the possibility of territorial "exchanges" between Moscow and Kiev

but Ukraine is categorically against it - the Ukrainian constitution does not allow for territorial concessions

The third participant: will his role be played?
The White House is considering inviting Volodymyr Zelensky

European leaders and Zelensky himself say that any negotiations without Ukraine are doomed to failure

NATO also emphasizes the importance of including Ukraine and its right to decide its own future

Whose side is under pressure?

Europeans and NATO are demanding fair conditions and security for Ukraine. In the US, some representatives have already declared their desire to stop funding the war and shift this burden to Europe

Senator Lindsey Graham warned that if the deal turns out to be too favorable for Putin, it could push other aggressive forces, such as China

What's at stake?

The risks are enormous: without Ukraine at the table, signing the agreement is a recipe for further instability. The solution must include guarantees, sanctions for violations and clear conditions, otherwise the conflict may resume. Alaska can become either a symbol of peace or a page of history with an alarming mark. We need to make sure that peace is not being built behind the backs of those who will ultimately pay for it - the Ukrainians.