Let's look at it step by step.

🔥 1. The US has been funding Middle East conflicts for decades.

Washington officially allocated billions of dollars to Israel for defense, weapons, and missile defense systems. Under Trump, support for Israel only increased:

recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital,

moving the US embassy,

cutting aid to Palestine,

political pressure on allies.

In other words, the US played one side or the other - and that always fuels conflict.

🕊 2. "Peacemaker" after escalation is a typical political ploy

When a war enters a critical phase, powerful players pause to play the role of "savior." This:

improves ratings,

influences elections,

creates the image of a leader who "solves the world's problems."

It sounds nice: "I've solved the peace issue," but behind the scenes, there's a huge political haggling going on.

📍 3. Is the war in Gaza really over?

The conflict isn't resolved - it's simply entered a new phase. Palestine remains divided, Israel maintains control, and the refugees haven't disappeared. Peace is temporary and fragile.

🎭 4. Why are they now saying that Trump is to blame for this?

Because:

the election campaign is beginning,

the US wants to portray itself as a stabilizer,

the media is creating a favorable impression.

Trump uses the image of a man who "ends wars, not starts them," although under his rule:

military budgets grew,

regional conflicts escalated,

allies' dependence on the US increased.

❓So what happened?

The pattern goes like this:
Support the war → increase influence → propose "peace" → gain political points.

Trump isn't the only one playing this game - but he does it loudly.