He even stated that if the conflict were successfully resolved, he could nominate Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize.

30-Day Ceasefire Proposed by the US
In March 2025, Ukraine agreed to a 30-day ceasefire proposed by the US, hoping that Russia would also accept the terms.

However, even after this, Russia continued its attacks, leaving many doubting Moscow's intentions.

Putin's Unilateral "Easter" Ceasefire
In April 2025, the Russian President declared a 30-hour "Easter" ceasefire, but the Ukrainian side quickly stated that artillery and airstrikes continued and that there was little credibility in such initiatives.

Coalition of "Peace Ready" and Security Guarantees
At the London Summit in March 2025, a coalition of states prepared to participate in ensuring peace in Ukraine was established, with the goal of creating reliable security guarantees in the event of a ceasefire or peace agreement.

While the coalition is still in the planning and discussion phase, there is no clear and unanimous format for its work.

Ambiguous Diplomatic Efforts
Western diplomatic initiatives aimed at ending the fighting are often met with delays and a lack of real response from Russia.

Despite enormous expenditures and international pressure, the strategy of "peace talks" has so far failed to produce results.

🔍 Analysis: Why Wars Don't End (or Only Stop Temporarily)

The Difficult Positions of the Parties
Russia maintains an interest in territorial control and uses war as a tool of pressure. Ukraine, in turn, demands security guarantees, the return of territories, and compensation for destruction.

Lack of Trust
Every "truce" quickly breaks down. Even when a formal ceasefire is declared, regular shelling and airstrikes continue.

Security Guarantees as a Key Element
To ensure the agreement remains stable, Ukraine insists on international guarantees (peacekeepers, international forces, third-party monitoring). This is the idea of ​​a coalition of "peace-ready" states.

The Role of Mediators and External Pressure
The success of peace initiatives often depends on pressure from strong states, mediators, and the willingness of the parties to compromise. Diplomatic efforts alone are not always sufficient.