Maybe someone here knows the answer to my question. The question is, when did we decide that tattoos look good on women? I can agree that a little tattoo can look cute on a beautiful girl. The thing that bothers me is that very beautiful women are like a work of art and to put a large tattoo on such a beautiful body is like drawing a mustache on the Mona Lisa. Tattoos are for gang members, convicts and biker chicks. So why would a beautiful, intelligent woman disfigure her body with that crap?

My theory is that it's an acceptance thing. It's for the followers of the crowd. They think it makes them special in some way. It doesn't make them special it just shows how desperate they are to be accepted by the rest of the cattle.

I met what I thought was the most beautiful woman in the world on this site. She was perfect in every way. In the past year she has destroyed a once beautiful body. I know I just an old fashioned man and tattoo's on a woman are a huge turn off for me. There is always that one person in a group that will suggest how beautiful a woman will look with a tattoo. In my humble opinion that person deserves to be shot in the head, dumped in a ditch on the side of a back road and left to rot.

My advice, don't be stupid, think for yourself! Don't be a member of the crowd, don't follow the latest trend. Grow up. Just remember following the crowd is the way wars start. And if you're a tattoo artist, oh wait that's an oxymoron. If your a tattoo hack stop making beautiful women look like circus freaks. Some moron talked them into this idea of getting a huge tattoo so try to talk them out of it.

Remember this is just my opinion.

Mike