As both a humanitarian and a Doctor of Psychology, I acknowledge that both males and females are of the same species of the human homo-sapien who have advanced into beings of cultured civilization and have developed conscious belief systems of religions or non religious secular belief systems which may or may not be political. Males and females are completely different in all aspects, in physicality, chemistry, and mental fortitude.

Males have since the dawn of time have dominated through physical presence, ego, and brutality. Females have been, since the dawn of time subjected to this dominance and thus had to have learned to outwit the male ego with their wiles of sexuality. Why? Because males in reality are sexually inept, they have no natural sensuality, they know only their immediate desire which is brought on by the arousal of their penis. They relieve that, and that is enough for them. They are done. Females are the opposite, they are naturally sensual, their sexuality encompasses their entire body, their needs are greater than that of the male. Males need instruction and need to be taught. Females are natural with sexuality and are the instructors and directors of sexual activities. Why else is prostitution often considered being the oldest profession? Because it was and is a power females can hold power over males and profit from.

Males throughout history have always maintained that they are the superior gender. Well, there are the minority among us who are better educated who actually know that females are the superior gender, they are more protective of their offspring in most cases than males are. They have proven throughout history as superior leaders as shown in ancient Egyptian dynasties with the exception of Cleopatra VII who was basically the downfall of the Egyptian empire but still considered a remarkable woman in history. The whereabouts to her tomb is still unknown. Although they still suspect it is in Egypt. Archeologists search for it with fever, although it is not considered an ancient tomb, the find would be incredible, because it is also where Mark Anthony, her lover is suppose to be entombed. Then there are other prominent leaders, Queen Victoria, Queen Elizabeth I and II, Prime Minister Margaret (Iron Lady) Thatcher all of the United Kingdom, and then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi of India. I can list many more. Famous female authors, composers, musicians, scientists, and leaders of industry.

In order for males to acknowledge females for their strength, intelligence, abilities, and extraordinary perspective it requires an understanding of two way communication and the most important aspect on the male side is the patience, tolerance and discipline to objectively listen and reply to that which is being said.
The point really being is, females have been winning the battles of empowerment within the last century, they won equal rights movements, feminism movements, defense against sexual harassment movements. Maybe not worldwide, but it is getting there. Further, they really do not have to promote their sexuality as a selling point any longer. There is nothing wrong with looking and feeling good about one's self, but the fact is most men are baseless and there singular ideal of arousal is focused on sexual presentation to seek a mate, is crude and egotistic.

I admit that I am drawn to attractive beautiful women, but I look at eyes, lips (smiles, showing of teeth), shape of face, cheekbones, forehead, chin, neck, posture, and I am not at all drawn to heaving bosoms. Otherwise women do not need to flash their cleavage in my face to catch my attention, I would rather they didn't. Besides, I prefer small to medium breasts because that provides at least a little more assurance I am not dealing with cosmetic alterations. I am not going to hate a female because she has large breasts, she just won't be my preference. I am divorced. My ex-wife had large breasts, I was actually attracted to her eyes and her freckles. Her breasts were natural, and caused her discomfort and back problems. She had to purchase custom made bras because no manufacture made something suitable off the shelf. Which meant it was an expense. These brassieres were part bra and part corset to provide weight and back support. It was even more expensive when she needed nursing bras. None of this had to do with our divorce. Our divorce was amiable (friendly) simply because I was forward thinking and she wanted to live in the past, and also she became devoted to an organized religion, which I would not accept. So we agreed to go our separate ways. She remarried, I remained single.